Canonical method

Delphi method: structuring expert judgement without hiding the disagreement

What must be established

A useful analysis keeps its controls visible.

  1. 01

    Define the question, the expertise criteria, the composition of the panel and the conflicts of interest.

  2. 02

    Pre-specify the rounds, the feedback provided, the consensus or stability rules and the handling of dropouts.

  3. 03

    Keep the distribution of answers, the minority arguments and the unresolved points in the report.

RESULT OBTAINED

A traceable Delphi dossier with protocol, panel, questionnaires, feedback, distributions, stability, disagreements and limits.

Decision reference

Make the next choice more explicit.

DECISION SUPPORTED

How to organise several rounds of anonymised expertise when data is incomplete and opinions are scattered?

DELIVERABLE TO KEEP

A traceable Delphi dossier with protocol, panel, questionnaires, feedback, distributions, stability, disagreements and limits.

NEXT ELEMENT TO EXAMINE

Morphological analysisExplore →

Write the protocol before the first round

The decision supported, the inclusion criteria, the number of rounds or the stopping rule and the definition of consensus are set before collection. This pre-specification avoids adapting the method to the desired result.

  • Question
  • Panel
  • Rounds
  • Stopping rule

Organise controlled feedback

After each round, the participants receive an anonymised synthesis of the answers and justifications. The feedback must allow revision without artificially erasing minority positions.

  • Anonymity
  • Distribution
  • Arguments
  • Revision

Report stability and dissent

The report shows the answers per round, the dropouts, the stability and the unresolved items. An absence of consensus can be useful strategic information rather than a failure to correct.

  • Evolution
  • Attrition
  • Stability
  • Persistent disagreement

DECISION ASSET

Delphi consultation protocol

The protocol makes visible the selection of the experts, the rules of each round, the feedback provided and the handling of disagreement.

Question

Input
Decision and horizon
Control
Is the scope bounded?
Output
Protocol

Panel

Input
Expertise and diversity
Control
Which criteria and conflicts?
Output
Justified composition

Rounds

Input
Questionnaire and feedback
Control
What do the participants see?
Output
Traceable iteration

Stop

Input
Stability or planned rounds
Control
What remains in disagreement?
Output
Bounded report
Decision enabled

Continue a round, stop on stability or explicitly record the disagreement.

Guardrail

No consensus threshold is universal. It must be defined before collection, justified and presented with the full distribution.

Resources

Reuse the method and verify its foundations.

Download the Delphi protocol

MOVE FROM ANALYSIS TO YOUR DECISION

Produce a testable decision mandate

Produce my mandate ↗

MOVE FROM ANALYSIS TO YOUR DECISION

Produce a testable decision mandate

Produce my mandate ↗

RETURN TO THE DECISION SYSTEM

See the canonical definition of marketing strategy→