Decision concept

Communities: detecting the groups of actors that structure the ecosystem

What must be established

A useful analysis keeps its controls visible.

  1. 01

    Specify the type of relation and the period of the graph.

  2. 02

    Compare computed detection and business interpretation.

  3. 03

    Check the stability of the groups when incomplete data changes.

RESULT OBTAINED

Interpretable groups, their bridging actors and their evolution over time.

Decision reference

Make the next choice more explicit.

DECISION SUPPORTED

Which groups of actors are more densely connected to one another than to the rest of the ecosystem?

DELIVERABLE TO KEEP

Interpretable groups, their bridging actors and their evolution over time.

NEXT ELEMENT TO EXAMINE

DependenciesExplore →

Build the graph before computing

Define the nodes, the direction and weight of the relations, the period, the sources and the deduplication rule. A relation can represent a contract, a citation, an investment or a flow, but these objects are not interchangeable. Missing links due to incomplete collection remain flagged.

  • Unit of the nodes
  • Type and direction of the link
  • Time window
  • Missing data

Distinguish community and betweenness

Community detection groups nodes according to a declared function, for example modularity. The betweenness of a node measures its presence on the shortest paths according to a specified formula and normalisation. The file displayed is a simulated illustrative set: its scores describe no real ecosystem.

  • Algorithm and version
  • Optimised function
  • Directed or undirected graph
  • Score normalisation

Test stability and business interpretation

Recompute after removing uncertain links, varying the window and changing the resolution. A group is interpreted only if it remains sufficiently stable and if external evidence explains the relations. The decision is reviewed when the coverage of the graph, the definition of the link or the membership of the bridging actors changes.

  • Sensitivity analysis
  • Stability of the groups
  • Business validation
  • Dated review

24 · ORIGINAL ASSET

Communities and bridging actors

Original graph

Three groups are distinguished by their relations. Betweenness centrality identifies the actors that connect otherwise separate communities.

Regulation
Technology
Market
Institute AConsultancy C

Normalised betweenness

Institute A · Regulation ↔ research0.72
Supplier B · Technology ↔ integrators0.61
Consultancy C · Companies ↔ media0.54

Teaching case · simulated data · no real-world market conclusion.

Resources

Reuse the method and verify its foundations.

Download the illustrative centrality set

MOVE FROM ANALYSIS TO YOUR DECISION

Produce a testable decision mandate

Produce my mandate ↗

MOVE FROM ANALYSIS TO YOUR DECISION

Produce a testable decision mandate

Produce my mandate ↗

RETURN TO THE DECISION SYSTEM

See the canonical definition of marketing strategy→