Decision concept

Market size: producing a defensible estimate

What must be established

A useful analysis keeps its controls visible.

  1. 01

    Choose a unit suited to the decision: revenue, volumes, accounts or uses.

  2. 02

    Reconcile at least two independent estimation methods.

  3. 03

    Present the range, the reference year and the sensitive assumptions.

RESULT OBTAINED

A low, central and high estimate with calculations, sources and confidence level.

Decision reference

Make the next choice more explicit.

DECISION SUPPORTED

How can the value or the volume of a market be estimated with incomplete data?

DELIVERABLE TO KEEP

A low, central and high estimate with calculations, sources and confidence level.

NEXT ELEMENT TO EXAMINE

Define the marketExplore →

Choose the unit before looking for a figure

The same demand can be expressed in revenue, volumes, accounts or uses. The unit is chosen according to the decision: an investment budget is compared with a value, a production capacity with a volume. Mixing two units in the same estimate makes the range unreadable.

  • Revenue for an investment decision.
  • Volumes or accounts to size a capacity.
  • A single unit per estimate, converted explicitly when needed.

Cross-check the top-down and bottom-up routes

The top-down route starts from a published market and applies documented filters to it; the bottom-up route multiplies a number of customers by an observed spend. Each has its biases: the first inherits a third party’s definition, the second the spending assumptions. Their gap is information, not a flaw to hide.

  • Top-down: published source, scope, filters and year.
  • Bottom-up: number of accounts, annual spend and usage rate.
  • A gap above the threshold set in advance requires the assumptions to be revisited.

Publish a range and its assumptions

A defensible estimate gives a low, central and high value, the reference year and the two or three assumptions that move the result most. The reader can then judge its robustness without redoing the calculation and knows which evidence would shift the decision.

  • Low, central and high values, with the reference year.
  • The most sensitive assumptions, named.
  • The evidence that would narrow the range.

20 · ORIGINAL ASSET

Reconciling a bottom-up and a top-down estimate

Worked example

Two independent methods rarely reach the same figure. The gap becomes a question to investigate, not a silent average.

Download the case as CSV ↓

Bottom-up

€21,600,000Accounts × spend
Relative gap0.0%Converging estimates

Top-down

€21,600,000Reported market × filter

Teaching case · simulated data · no real-world market conclusion.

Resources

Reuse the method and verify its foundations.

MOVE FROM ANALYSIS TO YOUR DECISION

Compare my markets using explicit criteria

Compare my markets ↗

MOVE FROM ANALYSIS TO YOUR DECISION

Compare my markets using explicit criteria

Compare my markets ↗

RETURN TO THE DECISION SYSTEM

See the canonical definition of marketing strategy→