Decision concept

TAM, SAM, SOM: telling theoretical, addressable and winnable potential apart

What must be established

A useful analysis keeps its controls visible.

  1. 01

    Calculate the TAM on the canonical definition of the market.

  2. 02

    Filter the SAM by offer, geography, regulation and access.

  3. 03

    Estimate the SOM by commercial capacity, competition, lead time and conversion evidence.

RESULT OBTAINED

Three reconciled ranges and the list of the assumptions that separate them.

Decision reference

Make the next choice more explicit.

DECISION SUPPORTED

Which share of the total market actually matches the offer, the coverage and the available capabilities?

DELIVERABLE TO KEEP

Three reconciled ranges and the list of the assumptions that separate them.

NEXT ELEMENT TO EXAMINE

Define the marketExplore →

Three nested scopes

The TAM measures total demand on the canonical definition of the market; the SAM the share that the offer, the geography and the regulation make it possible to serve; the SOM the share an organisation can actually win within the set horizon, given its capabilities and the competition.

  • TAM: total demand on the market definition.
  • SAM: share served by the offer, the coverage and the authorisations.
  • SOM: winnable share, bounded by commercial capacity and competition.

Explicit filters, not percentages

Moving from TAM to SAM and then to SOM is done through named and sourced filters: areas covered, segments served, regulatory constraints, sales capacity, observed conversion. Applying a standard share, identical from one market to another, produces a figure without evidence.

  • Each filter carries a source and a date.
  • The SOM follows from capacity and conversion, not from a ratio.
  • The filters set aside are listed, as renunciations.

Linking the SOM to a decision

The SOM is only useful if it supports a choice: opening a segment, sizing a team, setting a target. It is published as a range, with the horizon and the signal that would lead to revising it, for example a conversion lastingly below the assumption.

  • One SOM per compared option, over the same horizon.
  • A range rather than a point.
  • A review signal based on the observed conversion.

03 · ORIGINAL ASSET

TAM → SAM → SOM calculator

Calculation method

The model applies in turn the total potential, the scope actually served and the share reachable with the available capabilities.

TAM€21,600,00012,000 × €1,800
SAM€7,560,000TAM × 35%
SOM€907,200SAM × 12%

Teaching case · simulated data · no real-world market conclusion.

Resources

Reuse the method and verify its foundations.

Download the TAM, SAM, SOM calculation

DECISION SUPPORT METHOD

TAM, SAM and SOM calculation method with controls

The TAM measures a theoretical potential, the SAM the share that can really be served and the SOM the share that can be won within an explicit horizon. The three numbers must share the same unit, the same period and the same net price. Multiplying populations of different definitions produces apparent precision, not a defensible estimate.

Calculation method: TAM = eligible units × annual frequency × net price. SAM = TAM × product access rate × geographic access rate. SOM = SAM × sales capacity × win probability. Worked example: 12,000 accounts × 2 purchases × €800 = €19.2m of TAM. With 60% product coverage and 70% geographic coverage, the SAM is €8.064m. With 25% capacity and 20% win probability, the SOM is €403,200 over the year.

LevelReproducible calculationMandatory control
TAM12,000 × 2 × €800 = €19,200,000Check population, frequency, net price and period.
SAM€19,200,000 × 60% × 70% = €8,064,000Document the product and zone exclusions.
SOM€8,064,000 × 25% × 20% = €403,200Link capacity and win to observable internal evidence.
SensitivityLow/central/high SOM with ±20% on the assumptionsPresent a range, never a single point without uncertainty.

The committee can compare the value of the SOM with the cost of the required capabilities. An assumption without a source remains visible and is given a scenario; it is not silently absorbed into the central result.

MOVE FROM ANALYSIS TO YOUR DECISION

Compare my markets using explicit criteria

Compare my markets ↗

MOVE FROM ANALYSIS TO YOUR DECISION

Compare my markets using explicit criteria

Compare my markets ↗

RETURN TO THE DECISION SYSTEM

See the canonical definition of marketing strategy→